Publications

Relative to bred low-responder (bLR) rats, bred high-responder (bHR) rats have an exaggerated locomotor response to a novel environment, take more risks, are more impulsive, and more likely to exhibit compulsive drug-seeking behaviors. These phenotypic differences in addiction-related behaviors and temperament have previously been associated with differences in neurotransmitter signaling, including the mesolimbic dopamine system. In this study, we applied advanced in vivo microdialysis sampling in the nucleus accumbens of bHRs and bLRs to assess differences in basal and stimulated neurochemical efflux more broadly. We used liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry measurements of dialysate samples to quantify a panel of 17 neurochemicals, including dopamine, norepinephrine, serotonin, histamine, glutamate, GABA, acetylcholine, adenosine, DOPAC, 3-MT, HVA, 5-HIAA, normetanephrine, taurine, serine, aspartate, and glycine. We also applied a stable isotope labeling technique to assess absolute baseline concentrations of dopamine and norepinephrine in the nucleus accumbens. Finally, we investigated the role of norepinephrine tone in the nucleus accumbens on the bHR phenotype. Our findings show that bHRs have elevated basal and cocaine-evoked dopamine and norepinephrine levels in the nucleus accumbens compared to those of bLRs. Furthermore, norepinephrine signaling in the nucleus accumbens appeared to be an important contributor to the bHR phenotype because bilateral perfusion of the α1 adrenergic receptor antagonist terazosin (10 μM) into the nucleus accumbens abolished the response of bHRs to novelty. These findings are the first to demonstrate a role for norepinephrine in the bHR phenotype. They reveal a positive relationship between dopamine and norepinephrine signaling in the nucleus accumbens in mediating the exaggerated response to novelty and point to norepinephrine signaling as a potential target in the treatment of impulse control disorders.

Individual differences in temperament are associated with psychopathology in humans. Moreover, the relationship between temperament and anxiety-, depression-, PTSD- and addiction-related behaviors can be modeled in animals. This review will highlight these relationships with a focus on individual differences in the response to stressors, fear conditioning and drugs of abuse using animals that differ in their response to a novel environment. We will discuss behavioral and neurobiological commonalities amongst these behaviors with a focus on the hippocampus and, in particular, growth factors as promising novel targets for therapeutic intervention.

Environmental challenges during adolescence, such as drug exposure, can cause enduring behavioral and molecular changes that contribute to life-long maladaptive behaviors, including addiction. Selectively bred high-responder (bHR) and low-responder (bLR) rats represent a unique model for assessing the long-term impact of adolescent environmental manipulations, as they inherently differ on a number of addiction-related traits. bHR rats are considered “addiction-prone,” whereas bLR rats are “addiction-resilient,” at least under baseline conditions. Moreover, relative to bLRs, bHR rats are more likely to attribute incentive motivational value to reward cues, or to “sign-track.”

Cues in the environment can guide behavior in adaptive ways, leading one towards valuable resources such as food, water, or a potential mate. However, cues in the environment may also serve as powerful motivators that contribute to maladaptive patterns of behavior, such as addiction. Importantly, and central to this article, there is considerable individual variation in the extent to which reward cues gain motivational control over behavior. Here we describe an animal model that captures this individual variation, allowing us to better understand the psychological and neurobiological processes that underlie cue-evoked behaviors. When a discrete cue is paired with a food reward in a Pavlovian manner it acquires greater control over motivated behavior in some rats (‘sign-trackers’, STs) than in others (‘goal-trackers’, GTs). We review studies that have exploited this animal model to parse the neurobiological mechanisms involved in learning associations between stimuli vs. those involved in attributing incentive salience to those same stimuli. The latter seems to be dependent on dopamine and subcortical circuits, whereas the former may engage more cortical ‘top-down’ mechanisms.

The paraventricular nucleus of the thalamus (PVT) has been implicated in behavioral responses to reward-associated cues. However, the precise role of the PVT in these behaviors has been difficult to ascertain since Pavlovian-conditioned cues can act as both predictive and incentive stimuli. The “sign-tracker/goal-tracker” rat model has allowed us to further elucidate the role of the PVT in cue-motivated behaviors, identifying this structure as a critical component of the neural circuitry underlying individual variation in the propensity to attribute incentive salience to reward cues. The current study assessed differences in the engagement of specific PVT afferents and efferents in response to presentation of a food-cue that had been attributed with only predictive value or with both predictive and incentive value. The retrograde tracer fluorogold (FG) was injected into the PVT or the nucleus accumbens (NAc) of rats, and cue-induced c-Fos in FG-labeled cells was quantified. Presentation of a predictive stimulus that had been attributed with incentive value elicited c-Fos in PVT afferents from the lateral hypothalamus, medial amygdala (MeA), and the prelimbic cortex (PrL), as well as posterior PVT efferents to the NAc. PVT afferents from the PrL also showed elevated c-Fos levels following presentation of a predictive stimulus alone. Thus, presentation of an incentive stimulus results in engagement of subcortical brain regions; supporting a role for the hypothalamic–thalamic–striatal axis, as well as the MeA, in mediating responses to incentive stimuli; whereas activity in the PrL to PVT pathway appears to play a role in processing the predictive qualities of reward-paired stimuli.